Calculate association
rates
|
Welcome to the ppRate server!
This application allows to compute association
rates for protein-protein complexes from angular tolerances of mutual
orientation.
- To start a computation,
enter the required values in the fields on the left and click Submit.
When the computation is finished, the resulting association rate will
be sent to you via email.
- For a quick overview, a short getting-started guide is provided
below.
- For more details, please refer to the references listed on the right.
- You can also view
and download
a copy
of the C source code of the program (for personal use only). To compile
it, you will need the GSL library.
Questions, suggestions?
Please feel free to contact us at maxl@u.washington.edu
(M. Schlosshauer) with any questions or suggestions.
Getting started
Our model
The idea of our approach is to model protein-protein binding kinetics
via the free diffusion of two spherical molecules with anisotropic
reactivity. This diffusional problem can be solved exactly (see
reference 1; download
PDF).The reaction condition is formulated by specifying the
ranges of mutual orientations of the two molecules for which complex
formation will occur. We therefore do not require an exact mutual
alignment of the binding partners, but instead assume that favorable
short-range interactions "guide'" the molecules into their final bound
configurations once the molecules are oriented within specified angular
tolerances (see Fig. 1). These tolerances can therefore be viewed as an
implicit modelling of attractive short-range forces. As our model
completely neglects long-range forces (e.g., "electrostatic steering"),
it can be used to give an estimate for the basal association rate.
Fig.
1: The relevant angles to
describe the mutual orientation of the two spherical molecules.
How to obtain the angular tolerances
Estimates for the angular
tolerances can be derived from free energy
landscapes obtained by sampling configurations within and surrounding
the native binding funnel. The method described in reference
1 ( download
PDF) consists of the following main steps (see also Fig. 2):
- generate 1,000 alternative structures from the PDB
structure of the
native complex;
- evaluate the interaction energy (energy landscapes) of each
perturbed
structure;
- since the goal is to model diffusion in such energy
landscapes as free
diffusion with an effective capture region, define a capture energy
cutoff Ec below which the partners are
committed to bind as the average of the energies of the five lowest
lying structures greater than 10 Å rmsd from the native complex;
- among the structures with E
< Ec, select the 10
structures with the largest values of θA+θB;
- compute the angular constraints θA, θB,
δφ, δχ from averaging over the values found in these structures.
Fig. 2: Free energy funnels around the native
structure. The energy E and
the angular deviation θA is shown for a set of randomly perturbed
structures of a protein--protein complex. The two parallel lines
represent two different
energy cutoffs, while the vertical lines indicate the resulting angular
constraints.
Questions, suggestions?
Please feel free to contact us at maxl@u.washington.edu
(M.
Schlosshauer) with any questions or suggestions.
Credits
This service is the result of a collaboration between the Department of
Physics (M. Schlosshauer)
and Department of Biochemistry (D. Baker) at
the University of Washington.
Website developed and maintained by M. Schlosshauer. Webserver
hosted by the Baker Lab,
Department of
Biochemistry, University of Washington.
|
References
|
1. Enter the radii
of the two proteins:
|
-
M. Schlosshauer and
D. Baker (2004).
[download PDF]
Realistic protein-protein association rates from a simple diffusional
model neglecting long-range interactions, free energy barriers, and
landscape ruggedness.
Protein Science (13),
1660-1669.
- M. Schlosshauer and D. Baker (2002).
[download PDF]
A general expression for bimolecular association rates with
orientational constraints.
Journal of Physical Chemistry B 106(46), 12079-12083.
|